From - Mon Oct 13 17:05:35 1997
Path: news.bc!News1.Vancouver.iSTAR.net!news.istar.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!newsfeed.internetmci.com!199.117.161.1!csn!nntp-xfer-1.csn.net!boulder!usenet
From: whitmore@jila.colorado.edu (mike whitmore)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: AA, AAA, C, D & 9V Battery Specifications
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:39:46 GMT
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <3442adf4.30117141@cnsnews.colorado.edu>
References: <3441D580.5A36@omnitel.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jilajf.colorado.edu
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230
Xref: news.bc sci.electronics.design:6065

On Mon, 13 Oct 1997 18:02:08 +1000, Steve Bauer
<steveb@omnitel.com.au> wrote:

>Hi There,
>	 Does anyone have typical specifications on the Amp/hour ratting of the
>standard batteries below.
>
>
>9V Carbon	9V Alkaline
0.24AH                 0 .55AH
>AA   "			"
0.6AH                 2.4AH
>AAA  "			"

>C    "			"
1.8AH                  6.8AH
>D    "			"
3.8AH                  15AH
>
>Currnet draw is a typical 20mA.
These figures based on 16 to 300 mA draw, depending on battery
and manufacturer's data.  For heavy duty carbon zinc, multiply
carbon zinc figure by approx. 1.5.
I don't have data for AAA cells.

>
>Any information you can supply will save me performing the tests
>directly and be of benifit to others.
>
>
>regards
>Joseph